IDR Field Protocol · 2026 Edition
Your site is
being scanned
every day.
Automated legal systems are crawling thousands of e-commerce stores every day — reading source code, flagging violations, and building claim queues. Most merchants won't know until a demand letter arrives. This protocol was built from the federal cases that established what happens next.
Built from publicly documented federal cases, enforcement actions, and litigation patterns.
Free instant scan · No credit card · Results in under 60 seconds
Founding rate locks at $29/month permanently · Standard price $127 + $39/month after 500 stores
The Judicial Record
The cases that built this protocol.
These are not hypothetical scenarios. These are documented federal cases. They are publicly available. They establish three legal realities that govern your business today — and they are the foundation upon which every principle in this protocol is built.
Robles v. Domino's Pizza, LLC
913 F.3d 898 · 9th Circuit · Supreme Court Denied Certiorari October 7, 2019
A blind man could not order a pizza through Domino's website or app using screen-reading software. Domino's fought all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court refused to intervene — leaving the Ninth Circuit's ruling in place: the ADA applies to websites and mobile apps that extend a physical business.
When the Supreme Court declined to intervene, the practical signal was clear: website accessibility claims were now firmly in play. This case helped shape the legal environment e-commerce businesses operate in today.
Landmark · Certiorari DeniedHaynes v. Dunkin' Donuts LLC
No. 18-10373 · 11th Circuit Court of Appeals · July 31, 2018
Dennis Haynes could not access the Dunkin' Donuts website using screen-reading software to find store locations or purchase gift cards. The Eleventh Circuit reversed dismissal, holding the ADA applies to intangible barriers — not just physical ones.
Your website is legally an extension of your business. The ADA does not care whether the barrier is a broken step or a broken label in your source code.
Landmark · Reversed DismissalMurphy v. Eyebobs LLC
No. 1:21-cv-00017 · W.D. Pa. · Settled October 2021
Anthony Murphy sued the online eyewear retailer Eyebobs — despite the company having installed an accessibility overlay widget. Judge Lanzillo refused to dismiss. The settlement required removal of the overlay, full WCAG 2.1 source code remediation, and five years of compliance monitoring. In April 2025, the FTC separately fined the overlay vendor $1 million for making false compliance claims.
Federal courts and regulators have made clear that overlays alone are not a substitute for underlying remediation.
Settled · Widget RejectedDiaz v. The Kroger Co.
No. 18-cv-7953 · S.D.N.Y. · Dismissed 2019
Kroger submitted a detailed affidavit documenting that it had begun WCAG compliance before the lawsuit was filed, confirmed all identified barriers were fixed, and committed to ongoing monitoring. The Southern District of New York dismissed the case, citing the affidavit as the deciding factor.
The court did not require perfection. It required proof of process. Documented effort, ongoing commitment, and structured evidence changed the outcome entirely. This is the blueprint.
Dismissed · Documentation PrevailedThree legal realities established by these cases
Your website is covered by the ADA.
Multiple circuits have confirmed this.
Widgets are not a defense.
Courts and the FTC have confirmed this.
Documented process can materially improve posture.
Kroger illustrates why.
The Mechanism
You are not being
targeted.
You are being processed.
A modern plaintiff firm does not operate like a law practice. It operates like a data company. Automated scanners read your source code — not your site visually — and generate structured legal reports before a human ever reviews your case.
Accessibility litigation has become increasingly repeatable, data-driven, and concentrated among a small number of plaintiff firms. For e-commerce merchants, that shifts the risk from theoretical to operational.
— Based on public federal dockets, EcomBack annual reports, UsableNet lawsuit tracker, and Boston 25 News investigation
A headless browser reads your site's Document Object Model against WCAG criteria. This takes under 60 seconds. It does not see your design. It reads your structure.
Each failure is recorded with the page URL, the specific element, the exact failure type, and a timestamp — before you know any of it happened.
Your domain enters a claim queue. Some stores are filed within days. Others sit for weeks or months. The queue is prioritized by resistance level.
You receive a letter from a law firm you have never heard of, demanding between $5,000 and $25,000. Defense costs more than settling. Most merchants pay.
The IDR System
Most tools make your site
look accessible.
This system makes it defensible.
Four connected layers — each serving a specific legal and technical function.
IDR Scan Engine
Detection
Automated code-level scan aligned with WCAG evaluation practices. Identifies the specific failure patterns that appear most frequently in real ADA complaints: missing alt text, unlabeled form fields, keyboard traps, heading failures, contrast violations.
IDR Remediation Layer
Correction
Guided, code-level remediation for each identified issue. Not a visual overlay. Targeted structural corrections to the actual elements that create legal exposure.
IDR Evidence Log
Documentation
Every scan result, every correction, every update automatically logged with timestamps. Structured, timestamped, and versioned — the same principle that mattered in Kroger, generated automatically.
IDR Shield + Registry
Visibility
A live verification page at idrshield.com/verify/yourstore — not a badge, a record. Last scan date. Remediation activity. Current status. When an automated scanner or human reviewer encounters your site, they do not see silence.
Who This Serves
Built for operators,
not observers.
This is not a theoretical guide for people who are curious about accessibility law. It is a working protocol for businesses that are already exposed — whether they know it or not.
Shopify & WooCommerce Merchants
Stores doing $1K to $1M+ per month. Visible enough to be scanned. Small enough to be pressured. Unprotected enough to settle quickly.
You are the lawsuit mill's preferred inventory. The protocol was built around your specific exposure.
Store Owners Facing Immediate Exposure
The strongest use of this system is before a letter arrives. But if you have already received a demand letter, the Hard Target Response Protocol is designed to help you avoid reacting blindly.
The first 72 hours determine the direction. Structure your response before you send one.
Agencies & Developers
You build and manage client stores. When a client receives a demand letter, the first call is often to you. You carry liability exposure for every store you launched or manage.
Your clients' exposure is your exposure. The protocol gives you something to point to.
Inside the Protocol
41 pages. Zero filler.
Every section is operational. Every chapter answers a question a merchant actually faces.
- FrontJudicial Precedent — Why This Protocol Existsp. 3
- IntroImmediate Risk Notice + Small Business Reality Checkp. 7
- Ch. 1Anatomy of an Attack — How Your Site Is Scannedp. 13
- Ch. 2The Widget Trap — Why Surface Tools Failp. 15
- InsertLegal Perspective — What Actually Changes a Casep. 17
- SystemIDR System Overview — How This Is Executedp. 19
- Ch. 3Five Pillars of Remediation — Where Sites Breakp. 22
- Ch. 4Evidence Management — Why Fixing Isn't Enoughp. 25
- Ch. 5Hard Target Response Protocol — What to Dop. 27
- Ch. 6Deploying the Shield — Making the Work Visiblep. 30
- Ref.FAQ · Glossary · Enrollmentp. 35
41 PAGES · JUDICIAL PRECEDENT · RESPONSE PROTOCOL
Published by the
Institute of Digital Remediation
IDR Protocol Series · 2026 Edition
For most merchants, the cost of one rushed settlement conversation is many times higher than the cost of this protocol.
The only question is
whether you act
before the letter.
After the letter arrives, you are reacting. Before it, you are positioning. The merchants who built a documented record before they were selected are the ones who had something to show.
Become a Founding Member — $97Founding access · First 500 stores only · Standard price $127 after window closes
Work that is done once
fades. Work that is
maintained compounds.
Systems that are visible are far less likely to be tested.
This is the last decision point in this document.
Free scan · No credit card · Results in under 60 seconds